Winning Alone: Game Theory Tactics for One-Person Businesses | Dabble.AI #5
The Dabble.AI Project #5 - Exploring autonomous business models
How can I generate an entire book, that is well organized, and sounds like it was written by a human - in less than 1 day?
Today I spent about 5 hours working on a second draft of the game theory book. I didn’t spend any time writing or editing - the book is 100% AI generated at this point. All my time went into tweaking prompts and working through the prompt chaining.
This draft is still not something I’d publish. But it’s moving in the right direction - quickly. It’s 100x better than the first draft - in my opinion. I’m trying to get it to sound less like a Wikipedia page - it’s getting there. But to get it sounding more natural - it’s going to need more prompt tweaks. To that end, I had an idea - and I need your help.
So here’s my idea. I’m thinking that I could collect feeback using the comments on Google Docs, then feed the comments into a ChatGPT prompt that would be used to to make revisions for the next draft.
So, I have a favor to ask.
Would you mind reviewing the second draft and leaving comments about anything that you think needs addressing? You can skip to any chapter you’d like and provide as much or as little feedback as your time permits.
I’m not sure this idea will work but I’m super curious to find out.
If you do provide feedback…
I’ll list your name as a reviewer in the final version of the book - if you’d like.
I’ll also give you access to the prompts I used to generated the book - if you want.
Thanks in advance for your help!
I started reading it yesterday. At first I was really enjoying it but then I had a sense of frustration, because the text kept leading me to believe I was going to dive into a real case study, but it glossed over the real life example and kept going. For example, it tossed out an early real life example of a digital artist using game theory to evaluate different pricing strategies. But it never went deeper into which pricing strategy the person had chosen and why. In the next chapter it did something similar. I found this glossing over annoying.
Also I felt it was using too many different real life examples instead of sticking with one and really showing how game theory was applied and what effect this had.
Hope that makes sense.